Rich Dad, Poor Dad – Kiyosaki Gets it Wrong With Money
Robert Kiyosaki’s Book, “Rich Dad, Poor Dad” has long been hailed as a must read for anyone who wants to do well with money. In the book, he compares the financial advice of his two fathers, his well educated father who was a typical American, and his other father (who was actually his friend’s father) who was more of an entrepreneurial type.In the book, he asks the entrepreneurial father to teach him about money. The “rich dad” then teaches him through various life lessons about how money works. The rich dad teaches him the value of financial intelligence, using corporations to avoid taxes, and building business systems and income producing assets rather than the traditional means of working hard and saving for the future.
The book and Kiyosaki’s teachings as a whole have on critical flaw. He never factors in risk. Kiyosaki suggests that we focus on a few “good investments” rather than diversifying your portfolio. This is a great way to become broke, very quickly. In fact, Robert Kiyosaki lost all of his money in 1985 when his t-shirt business failed. Kiyosaki had to declare bankruptcy and ultimately became homeless! Risk is an extremely important part of finance that Kiyosaki just glosses over and barely ever mentions. You have to factor in risk in your investments, otherwise you would be going to Vegas and betting your money on 18 black all the time because the payout is about 4000%! Of course you wouldn’t do that because there’s far too much risk involved!
“Rich Dad, Poor Dad” has a lot of anecdotal stories and lessons, but offers almost no concrete advice that one should follow. Many readers of the book feel extremely motivated to become financially independent and are ready to “escape the rat race”, but they soon realize that the book gives them no idea how to proceed. If this book is supposed to teach us about money, should it not give us concrete suggestions as to what we should do in order to become financially independent?
It’s quite clear that some of the things that Kiyosaki is teaching is quite simply, bad advice. Perhaps his “rich dad” was not as wise as Kiyosaki had thought. Kiyosaki described his “rich dad” as one of the richest men in Hawaii. After the rich dad could never be found, many people believed that the rich dad was a metaphor rather than an actual person. In 2003, Kiyosaki backed off from the statement that “rich dad” was a real person, and instead stated, “Is Harry Potter real? Why don’t you let Rich Dad be a myth, like Harry Potter?”
Kiyosaki’s book just does not offer a worthwhile plan to follow, and it practically ignores risk all together. I think I’ll get my financial advice from someone who actually has a lot of money, as opposed to the mythical “rich dad.”
Labels: financial plans, robert kiyosaki


13 Comments:
I really, really don't like Kiyosaki. This book espouses utterly terrible personal finance and is only "known" because Kiyosaki got involved with pyramid marketing and used those "sales" numbers to convince larger publishers that he was a big success.
I will ~never~ review a book by Kiyosaki on my site.
First off, I think that Kiyosaki's books are simply motivational tools and, as you indicated, are not a financial guidebook for the average person.
However, his views on risk are not completely off base. He views risk in terms of "control" over one's investments. For instance he views Real Estate as less risky because one has control over the property and the renters etc. However, he does not include the leverage involved with the mortgage portion of the investment as "risk" which he should.
This post has been removed by the author.
I agree - however, I don't think Kiyosaki is really motivational. At least not any more motivational than I would be had I written a book that was basically a collection of theories and ‘hypotheticals’ with no "real" game plan on how to achieve anything.
Dateline or 60 minutes (one of those shows) did a piece that involved him where he would personally teach 5 or so people how to succeed and then they'd follow them and track how they did. Big surprise that no one did well at all. I tried to find a link to a video of that show, but couldn't...I'll keep looking though, 'cause it was great.
----
www.climbingoutofdebt.blogspot.com
Well, I liked the book. I also read Cash Flow Quadrant & am reading his Wife's book (which does have some strategic advice on how she made money) "Rich Woman" I know he has written a slew of other books on realestate investing & the like.
I think that he made a bulk of his money in the beginning off the cash flow game he invented. So since I don't think I'll be inventing a new board game anytime soon, I'll stick with the concepts & come up with my own game plan. They also didn't have (or still don't have) kids, so becoming homeless as a sacrifice for our future investments isn't an option for everyone (boy I'd have some money to invest if we did!!!)
Is it me or does everyone want the rich to tell them exactly how they got there, if they did that we'd all be there & who would they have to do their gardening???
I wasn't terribly impressed with the book either. While some claim it might be motivational, what is so motivational about being told glossy half truths or even lied to.
If there is one thing I got from Rich Dad, it was a curiosity about investing in real estate. What vague strategies he described in the book are mostly out dated and the exception, not the rule. I've done a ton of research in the last month and am preparing myself to purchase investment property this year.
I talked to some other people about the books before reading and was almost sold on additional books, but after reading for myself, I won't put another dime in RK's pockets.
My take is that the book is not aim to be a catch all to how you should deal with money.
It is targetted more towards the general public who has very little awareness of financial principles, The book acted more like a little friendly reminder to raise awareness of our limited financial literacy.
I think it's a worthwhile book. If for nothing else it makes you think about passive income. How that comes about is not important. It also makes you think about what is a true asset and what is a liability. These are good things.
why do we look at what he does nt discuss . He says a lot about finances and investments which i guess is worth reading . I like cash flow quadrant as well . Good motivations
John Reed has written a long and very detailed analysis about what Mr Kiyosaki is wrong about investing. I think its well worth reading.
I agree with Gagan, Why should I go out of the scope of the book. The book clearly mentions that it is for those who don't know about money... I strict sense it is for those who are not financial planners and never will. He tells us about asset classes and how to differentiate between them.I think I ll post a detailed review on the book what we can learn from that book and Why...
Reading "Rich Dad.." alone does not address risk, but RK certainly does in the following books. He even says 'risk' is why most people don't become wealthy. Plus he provides a list of suggested reading. A clear indicator that no one book could give you a road map to riches. It is always a process. And of course what are you willing to sacrifice.
You don't have to put money in RK's pocket to read his books. Hello public library!!
I really, really like Kiyosaki because he exposes the false facade of the financial industry. Not that one should accept his views uncritically, but they are a must read for an unconventional viewpoint. They aren't going to make you rich, but they will get you to think about what it takes to get rich.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home